Initial Prediction Results Involving Targets for 1 June 2008

Months prior to 1 June 2008, remote viewers involved in this study remote viewed targets that had not yet been chosen. That is, the sessions were done first, and the targets were assigned to those sessions afterward. The sessions, the target pool, and the lists of 999 randomized target assignments were posted in encrypted form on this web site to download prior to 1 June 2008. On 4 June 2008, the closing Dow Jones Industrial Average was used to determine which among 999 randomized target assignments would be applied to the remote-viewing sessions. Thus, the remote-viewing sessions predicted which targets would be assigned to those sessions. The table below contains one interpretive measure of how well the viewers did.

The table below contains the "clarity scores" for the remote-viewing sessions conducted for targets with target dates of 1 June 2008. The scores are explained farther below. Clicking on each viewer's name will give you ore detailed session evaluation information.

Viewer T1 T4 T7 T10 T13 T16 T19 T22
CRV                

Darryl Smith

3 3 3 3        

Viewer 423

2 3 3 0        

Pat Sage

3 3 3 3        
                 
HRVG                

Dick Allgire

2 1 1 0 1.5 0 3*  

Sita Seery

2 2 0 0 0 1    

Maria Naulty

2 0 3 3        

Debra Duggan-Takagi

2 1 1.5 2        

Anne M. Koide

2 2 3 3        
                 
SRV                

Courtney Brown**

2.5 0 1 X# X# 3 3 2

* This session was done after 1 June 2008 and was not included in the encrypted files.
# These sessions were corrupted due to a faulty closing process and cannot be included in the study.
** Courtney Brown's participation as a viewer in this study is different from that of the other remote viewers. Since the target pool was designed by Courtney Brown, his participation was different in that he was essentially attempting to "place the targets in the correct order" rather than trying to remote view targets of which he had no prior knowledge. All other viewers had no information regarding the content of the target pool.

Clarity Scores applicable only to 2008 targets
3: excellent target contact and description
2: good target contact with some decoding errors
1: basic target contact with significant decoding errors
0: no discernable target contact or gross decoding errors

Viewers are encouraged to examine these sessions individually.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Contribute to The Farsight Institute
 

Scientific Remote Viewing®, SRV®, and Farsight® are internationally registered service marks of Farsight, Inc. The Farsight ProtocolsSM is a service mark of Farsight, Inc.
Session Analysis Machine™ and SAM™ are trademarks of Farsight Inc.
This entire site is Copyright © 1996-2010 The Farsight Institute. All rights reserved.
DISCLAIMER
URL: http://www.farsight.org