Predicted Earthquake Event for Los Angeles by 1 December 2008
(Original prediction posted 27 June 2008)
The Los Angeles Seismic Event Experiment:
(Updated 10 December 2008)
On 27 June 2008, and based on the remote-viewing data presented below, we predicted a significant earthquake to hit Los Angeles before 1 December 2008. Twelve remote-viewing sessions were used in the analysis. Of the 12, some sessions suggested a seismic event that could be potentially catastrophic. The other remote-viewing sessions did not contain such catastrophic content, but the theme of a significant—although not necessarily catastrophic—seismic event seemed consistent with much of the remaining remote-viewing data. It is not unusual for many remote viewers to occasionally exaggerate the magnitude of such events once they perceive the idea of an earthquake, and it is not possible to fully evaluate the complete collection of remote-viewing data until after the target window is past and the data can be compared with the actual target. In this case, the target window ended on 1 December 2008.
On Tuesday, 29 July 2008, there was a 5.4-5.8 magnitude earthquake in Los Angeles, a significant and unusual seismic event by any measure. This event exactly matches the predicted timing posted here on 27 June 2008 of a significant seismic event in the Los Angeles area. The following graph was included in the original prediction.
Some thoughts:There were significant unknowns in analyzing these data. One unknown is analytic inexperience at working with earthquake scenarios, and the analyst (in this case, Courtney Brown) may have placed too much emphasis on those data that suggest a major seismic event in Los Angles. Alternate approaches to analysis specific to HRVG and CRV (both of which are much different from each other) would have produced more nuanced predictions. But time is also an important unknown with respect to these data. No one really knows if a target can be so precisely framed such that the target window would definitively end precisely on a certain date. If an event as important as a major earthquake hits a city within a few weeks after the date mentioned in the target definition, would remote viewers nonetheless pick up the event in their data? Remote viewing is a mental activity, and would the mental activity associated with such a collectively powerful event leak across time such that it is picked up by a remote viewer who is probing a target with a target date that is prior to the event occurring? For example, it is well known that remote viewers can pick up the disturbing emotional essence of a target location if a target site was once the location of horrific acts, even if those acts happened long ago. Does the same relate to an earthquake setting? We do not know. Since the LAX airport on 1 December 2008 does not look like what the remote-viewing data suggest it might look like on that date, is it reasonable to wonder if a more significant earthquake may happen in Los Angeles in the near future following 1 December 2008? This is not a prediction, just a thought. The remote-viewing data for this experiment are perplexing on many levels. Nowhere in any session is there the depiction of a functioning city or airport. Moreover, the remote viewers participating in this experiment reported highly accurate data across a variety of diverse targets in the Climate Project, and all of the sessions were done at approximately the same time under similar conditions. Why should that be? Again, on many levels, these data are puzzling.
But consider this: Could these results have been caused by the existence of multiple universes, or an alternate reality in which a major seismic event actually did occur prior to 1 December 2008? We are conducting an experiment relating to multiple universes now, and you may want to look at these results over the coming weeks and months. We may know the answer to this interesting question very soon.
The Data:
Target 25: LAX, 1 December 2008, 12 noon target local time
CRV Sessions
HRVG Sessions
Target 27: LAX, The moment of greatest activity in changing the fundamental character of this target from the way it exists on 19 June 2008 to the way it exists on 1 December 2008.
CRV Sessions
HRVG Sessions
