|
Public Demonstration of
Remote Viewing
Statistical Summary
PART I: Overview
The statistical analyses that are presented
below for each remote-viewing session conducted for the 1999-2000
public demonstration of remote viewing utilize The Farsight Institute's
"Session Analysis Machine"
(SAM). This computer-based method of analyzing remote-viewing sessions was not available in its present form during the 1999-2000
public demonstration. Subsequent to the completion of the demonstration,
the remote-viewing sessions conducted at that time have been
input into and processed by SAM in a manner that preserves both
the literalness of the remote-viewing data as well as the objectivity
of the computer-based method of analysis. Future public demonstrations
of remote viewing will incorporate remote viewing methods that
are adapted to the requirements of SAM.
SAM is just one component of a total analysis
of remote-viewing data. SAM offers an objective process and standard
for analysis of such data. But this objective analysis needs
to be combined with a subjective analysis of remote-viewing data
as well in order to complete a total analysis of the data. Subjective
analysis includes inspection of sketches as well as a close reading
of verbal remote-viewing data. All remote-viewing sessions are
then judged on their ability to pass both the objective
(SAM) as well as the subjective analyses.
The SAM (objective) method of analysis currently
involves three statistical procedures or tests. You can read
about these procedures here:
TEST ONE: Basic Counts and
a Chi-square Test
TEST TWO:
The Russell Procedure
TEST THREE:
Correspondence and Correlation
Visitors to our web site are invited to look
at the actual (raw) remote-viewing session pages (where sketches
and verbal data can be found) in addition to examining the statistical
analyses presented below. To see the actual session pages, go
to our Public Demonstration Resource
Center.
PART II: Individual Session Statistical Analyses
Experiment #1
Session
#1 - Total Session (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#1 - Second Half of Session (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#3 (Viewer: Joey Jerome)
Experiment #2 (Cancelled due to procedural
error.)
Experiment #3
Session
#1 (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#2 (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#3 (Viewer: Joey Jerome)
Experiment #4
Session
#1 (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#2 (Viewer: Joey Jerome)
Experiment #5
Session
#1 (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#2 (Viewer: Joey Jerome)
Experiment #6
Session
#1 (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#2 (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#3 (Viewer: Joey Jerome)
Experiment #7
Session
#1 (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#2 (Viewer: Joey Jerome)
Experiment #8
Session
#1 (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#2 (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#3 (Viewer: Joey Jerome)
Experiment #9
Session
#1 (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#2 (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#3 (Viewer: Joey Jerome)
Experiment #10
Session
#1 (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#2 (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#3 (Viewer: Joey Jerome)
Experiment #11
Session
#1 (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#2 (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#3 (Viewer: Joey Jerome)
Experiment #12
Session
#1 (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#2 (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#3 (Viewer: Matthew Pfeiffer)
Experiment #13 (Cancelled due to procedural
error.)
Experiment #14
Session
#1 (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#2 (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#3 (Viewer: Matthew Pfeiffer)
Experiment #15
Session
#1 (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#2 (Viewer: Courtney Brown)
Session
#3 (Viewer: Matthew Pfeiffer)
|
